One of the great cultural phenomenon's
of the last decade was the TV show Lost. It
captured audiences with it's movie like production quality, strongly
developed characters, and most notably the mysterious and winding
plot, often filled with holes. A demand for answers to the questions
created by the show was a driving force in keeping the fans
interested enough to stick around for six seasons. While many people
feel Lost didn't
provide a satisfying amount of answers (although this blogger disagrees, and so do I), the show itself remains as one of the best
TV shows of the last ten years. A key contributor to the show's
mystery was creator/writer Damon Lindelof. In Prometheus, a
prequel to the Alien franchise,
Lindelof brings his ability to write mysterious, action-packed,
character rich, if hole-filled plots.
Prometheus
is the story of a group of earth
scientists headed to a far away planet after discovering a number of
depictions from a number of ancient societies of giant figures
pointing to a system of stars or planets. The scientists believe that
the images show an alien species pointing to their home world, and
that the alien species is responsible for the creation of humans.
Sure enough afer over two years of space travel, the scientists
arrive at the alien planet to find that the aliens they had hoped to
encounter are all long dead. The scientists explore the ruins of
their civilization only to find that everything is not what it
appears to be. Quickly, the philosophical posturing of the film
devolves into the type of horror film the Alien series
is known for.
I may
be coming across as overly harsh. The film does do a number of things
very well. The cinematography and digital effects are extremely well
done. I saw this movie in 2D, so I can't speak to the film's
experience in 3D, but I imagine it would be something like a darker
version of Avatar. Overall,
the acting is excellent in this film as well. I was also pleasantly
surprised to see a decent amount of in camera special effects used
along side of the GGI magic. Michael Fassbender is excellent as
always as David, the ship's android capable of translating and
speaking the alien language. His role is very reminiscent of the
villainous AI of HAL 9000 from Kubrick's 2001. Fassbender's
performance is captivating, playing an emotionless automaton with a
hint of angst for not being able to have emotions, as well as the
smallest bit of malevolence towards those who can. Watching him
imitate Peter O'Toole in Lawrence of Arabia is
a particular treat. Idris Elba also does a fantastic job as the
ship's captain stuck between trying to protect the scientists mission
and the interests of the Weyland Corporation's who is financing the
expedition. The onboard presence of the Weyland Corporation is held
by the commander of the ship, played by Charlize Theron. Noomi Rapace
plays the lead scientist and protagonist of the film, but her
performance simply isn't as strong as her supporting cast.
The
pacing of this film was also very awkward. The first half of the film
moves at a glacial pace, setting up who every one is, where they are,
and why they're there. Once people start dying though the film moves
at a breakneck speed, introducing new plot points one after the
other, twisting the story into a complex mess. THIS VIDEO highlights
a number of the plot holes that left me scratching my head (WARNING:
SPOILERS). The plot is also over-stuffed with Chekhov's guns, that
make the final scenes rather predictable. The ending of the film
implies an eventual sequel. Hopefully, the sequel deals more with the
scientific and philosophical elements that were so hastily dealt with
here.
Rating: 6.5/10 - Moral
I'll pop in as someone who did see it in 3D and say that I found the quality of the 3D to be some of the best I've seen. Whether you actually think 3D is worth while is another story entirely, but from a striclty technical persepctive it was good. The images were clear, and the darkening that naturally comes with 3D was not an issue despite the film already being dark. I'm generally a fan of 3D so normally see it that way when given the option, but for those on the fence about spending an extra dollar or two I say give this one a shot. That being said, it's obviously not going to dramatically change the film, so not much (if anything) is lost if you prefer 2D.
ReplyDelete